Blog

• 

  How to Optimize High-Frequency Magnetics for Next-Gen Integrated OBC + DC/DC Converters under 800V EV Architecture

  May 24, 2026

  Discover how nanocrystalline cores solve core loss and thermal bottlenecks in 800V Integrated OBC + DC/DC designs utilizing SiC and CLLLC/DAB topologies. The electrification of the automotive industry is undergoing a massive architectural shift. As electric vehicles (EVs) transition from 400V to 800V platforms to unlock ultra-fast charging, the traditional decentralized power supply design is hitting its physical limits.   To achieve the critical industry goals of lightweight design and cost reduction, the market is rapidly moving toward Integrated OBC + DC/DC power conversion architectures. By sharing the DC-link bus, consolidating power semiconductor switches, and combining control boards, integrated systems can achieve up to a 30% reduction in volume and weight, alongside substantial BOM cost savings.   However, moving toward an integrated high-voltage, high-frequency domain introduces a severe secondary bottleneck: High-Frequency Magnetic Design. When switching frequencies shift into the hundreds of kilohertz (kHz) range via Wide Bandgap (WBG) semiconductors like Silicon Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs, conventional magnetic materials like manganese-zinc (MnZn) ferrites exhibit drastic core losses and thermal runaway.   To overcome this, next-generation integrated topologies—specifically CLLLC and Dual Active Bridge (DAB) resonant converters—require a fundamental material revolution: Nanocrystalline Cores.   1. The Architectural Evolution: Why Integrated OBC + DC/DC is Crucial for 800V EVs In traditional EV power architectures, the On-Board Charger (OBC) and the Low-Voltage DC/DC Converter (LDC) are treated as two isolated systems. Each possesses its own power factor correction (PFC) stage, isolated LLC/PSFB stages, independent microcontrollers (MCUs), cooling plates, and distinct housing enclosures. This decentralized approach leads to a massive component count, excessive high-voltage cabling, and a bulky footprint. The next-generation Power Domain Integration approach reorganizes this entirely. In a typical SiC-based Integrated OBC + DC/DC system, the hardware utilizes a highly integrated multi-port or shared-topology matrix: Shared High-Voltage DC-Link Bus: Eliminates one full stage of high-voltage capacitors and pre-charge circuits. Power Switch Multiplexing: In bidirectional topologies supporting Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G), the same primary-side SiC MOSFET bridges handle both incoming AC-to-DC grid charging and outgoing DC-to-AC power routing. Consolidated Thermal & EMI Systems: A single liquid-cooling plate handles the entire integration block, and the unified housing drastically simplifies Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) filtering layout. While this hardware compression achieves higher efficiency and volumetric power density, it forces the high-frequency magnetics—the main isolation transformers and resonant inductors—to handle significantly higher volt-second products and extreme high $dv/dt$ stresses within an ultra-compact space.   2. Topologies Driving the Integration: CLLLC vs. DAB Selecting the optimal circuit topology is the foundation of high-power-density EV power design. For integrated systems requiring bidirectional capability, two architectures dominate the 800V platform: The CLLLC Resonant Converter The CLLLC topology has emerged as the premier choice for bidirectional integrated OBCs. Featuring symmetric resonant networks on both the primary and secondary sides, it provides excellent soft-switching characteristics—achieving Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) for the primary switches and Zero Current Switching (ZCS) for the secondary rectifiers across the entire wide battery operating voltage range. When paired with SiC MOSFETs operating at 100 kHz to 300 kHz, CLLLC structures drastically minimize switching losses. However, the performance of a CLLLC network is highly dependent on the stability of its resonant components. The leakage inductance of the transformer is often utilized as part of the resonant inductance, which requires incredibly tight control over magnetic flux leakage and core characteristics under variable thermal conditions. The Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Converter The DAB topology utilizes phase-shift control between two full bridges to regulate power flow. It offers excellent flexibility in managing wide input/output voltage variations, making it highly effective for the DC/DC converter stage routing power from the 800V traction battery down to the 14V/48V low-voltage auxiliary power module (APM). However, DAB converters can experience high circulating currents and loss of ZVS under light-load conditions, which induces sharp current spikes and elevates high-frequency AC copper losses (due to skin and proximity effects) and core losses in the main transformer.     3. The Magnetics Bottleneck: Why Ferrite Fails at High Frequency & High Voltage For decades, MnZn power ferrites have been the default choice for power transformers. But as EV power electronics push deeper into the 800V domain with fast-switching SiC devices, ferrites hit a definitive performance wall caused by three fundamental material limitations: Low Saturation Flux Density (Bsat): Power ferrites typically saturate between 0.4T and 0.5T at room temperature, dropping drastically to around 0.35T at 100°C. This low threshold forces engineers to use larger core cross-sectional areas (Ae), directly contradicting the requirement for high power density. Poor Thermal Conductivity: Ferrite is a ceramic material with low thermal conductivity (typically 3–5 W/m·K). Under high-frequency operation, the heat generated inside the core cannot escape efficiently, creating a severe localized temperature rise that quickly drives the material toward its Curie temperature, risking complete system failure. High Temperature Dependency of Losses: Ferrite core losses (Pv) are highly non-linear with respect to temperature. Minimum loss is usually tuned for 80°C or 100°C; if the system operates outside this window, losses spike rapidly, creating a dangerous positive thermal feedback loop.   4. Nanocrystalline Cores: The Hidden Catalyst for High Power Density To break through the limitations of ferrite, next-generation integrated EV power electronics are pivoting to Fe-based Nanocrystalline Ribbons. Derived from rapid-solidification technology, nanocrystalline materials blend the high saturation induction of amorphous metals with the low losses of advanced ceramics. Magnetic Property MnZn Power Ferrite Fe-based Nanocrystalline  Saturation Flux Density (Bsat) ~0.45 T 1.2 T Initial Permeability (ui) 2,000 – 5,000 30,000 – 100,000 Core Loss (Pv) @ 100kHz, 0.2T ~100 kW/m³ ≤ 35 kW/m³ Curie Temperature (Tc) ~220°C > 560°C Operating Temperature Range -40°C to 125°C -50°C to 180°C   Shrinking the Footprint via 1.2T Saturation With a Bsat of 1.25T—nearly three times higher than ferrite—nanocrystalline cores allow design engineers to design with a much higher operational flux density (Delta B). According to the fundamental transformer design equation:   An increased Bm allows for a dramatic reduction in both the core cross-sectional area (Ae) and the number of winding turns (N). This creates a powerful compounding effect: a smaller core slashes total volume, while fewer turns significantly shorten the winding length, mitigating AC copper losses caused by high-frequency skin effects.   Extreme Thermal Stability Across Wide Load Profiles Unlike ferrites, whose loss profiles fluctuate violently across automotive temperature extremes (-40°C to 150°C), JH Amorphous' custom nanocrystalline chemistry delivers a nearly flat core-loss curve up to its operational limits. Boasting a Curie temperature exceeding 560°C, it completely eliminates the threat of high-frequency thermal runaway, ensuring ultra-reliable performance under harsh automotive environments.   5. Advanced Component Design: Planar Transformers and Common Mode Integration Material selection is only half the battle. To fully unlock the performance of nanocrystalline materials in Integrated OBC + DC/DC systems, engineers must deploy advanced structural design methodologies.   Planar Transformers with Nanocrystalline Chokes For high-power density CLLLC and DAB converters, traditional wire-wound transformers are increasingly replaced by Planar Transformers. Utilizing multi-layer heavy-copper PCBs or lead-frame copper stampings as windings, planar designs achieve exceptionally low profile heights, outstanding thermal coupling to liquid-cooled cold plates, and highly repeatable leakage inductance profiles. Integrating a low-loss nanocrystalline magnetic shunt or gapped core within the planar structure allows for precise tuning of the leakage and magnetizing inductances needed for resonant tanks. This eliminates the need for an external, bulky discrete resonant inductor.   Multi-functional EMI Integration Integrated power conversion domains suffer from complex, overlapping noise spectrums. Fast SiC switching edges (dv/dt) induce severe Common Mode (CM) and Differential Mode (DM) electromagnetic noise.   By taking advantage of the ultra-high permeability (ui 80,000) of nanocrystalline alloys, engineers can design compact, multi-stage EMI filters. High permeability enables the required inductance to be achieved with fewer turns, reducing parasitic winding capacitance and pushing the self-resonant frequency (SRF) higher. This ensures excellent high-frequency attenuation across strict automotive noise limits.   Future-Proofing EV Power Designs with JH Amorphous The race toward 800V high-voltage platforms and Integrated OBC + DC/DC architectures demands more than just faster silicon or wider bandgap switches. It requires a fundamental shift in the passive components that manage the power. High-frequency magnetic design is the definitive bottleneck dictating the size, efficiency, and thermal boundaries of next-generation EV power electronics.   At JH Amorphous, we specialize in engineering high-performance Fe-based nanocrystalline cores, high-frequency transformers, and integrated magnetic assemblies tailored specifically for automotive power domains. Our advanced material processing guarantees ultra-low core losses under high $dv/dt$, high temperature stability, and optimized dimensional footprints to help you shrink your designs without compromising efficiency.   Contact Our Engineering Team   Ready to optimize your next 800V CLLLC or DAB converter project? Don't let magnetic core loss throttle your system's efficiency.   📩 Contact our application specialists today at julia@amorphousoem.com to receive custom magnetic core samples and comprehensive high-frequency loss characterization datasheets.

  Hot Tags : high-frequency magnetics SiC MOSFET Integrated OBC + DC/DC 800V EV Platform DAB converter CLLLC topology

  Read More
• 

  Mastering EMI Suppression: A Comprehensive Guide to Common Mode Chokes

  May 12, 2026

  In modern power electronics and high-speed data transmission, noise is the enemy of performance. Whether you are designing a medical device or an EV charging system, managing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) is critical for regulatory compliance and signal integrity. At the heart of this challenge is a vital component: the Common Mode Choke.   What is a Common Mode Choke? A common mode choke is an electromagnetic component used to filter out high-frequency noise shared by two or more power or signal lines. It provides high impedance to unwanted "common mode" noise while allowing the intended "differential mode" signals to pass through with minimal loss. How a Common Mode Choke Works   The device consists of two insulated copper coils wound around a single magnetic core. It operates based on the principle of magnetic field interaction: Common Mode Noise: Currents flow in the same direction on both lines. Their magnetic fields reinforce each other within the core, creating high resistance that "chokes" the noise.   Differential Signals: Desired currents flow in opposite directions. The magnetic fields cancel each other out, allowing the signal to flow freely without distortion.   Selecting the Right Core Material The magnetic core is the "brain" of the choke. The material you choose—whether it’s traditional ferrite or advanced nanocrystalline—directly dictates your filter’s frequency response and thermal limits.   1. MnZn Ferrite (Manganese-Zinc) Best for: Low-to-Mid Frequency Suppression (10kHz – 30MHz). MnZn ferrite is the industry standard for general EMI filtering. Key Benefit: High initial permeability (μi up to 15,000) provides massive impedance at low frequencies. Typical Use: AC/DC power supplies and household appliance filters.   2. Nanocrystalline (e.g., 1K107) Best for: High-Density & High-Temperature Applications. Nanocrystalline cores are the premium choice for modern hardware, offering high saturation induction (~1.25T). Key Benefit: Exceptional performance in a compact footprint and high stability up to 180°C. Typical Use: Electric Vehicle (EV) onboard chargers, solar inverters, and high-performance server supplies.   3. NiZn Ferrite (Nickel-Zinc) Best for: High-Frequency & Radiated EMI (>30MHz). Key Benefit: High electrical resistivity prevents eddy current losses at MHz and GHz frequencies. Typical Use: Data lines (USB-C, HDMI, CAN bus) and communication hardware.   Technical Material Comparison Material Type Permeability (μi) Saturation (Bs) Ideal Frequency Range Footprint MnZn Ferrite 5,000 – 15,000 ~0.5 T 10kHz - 30MHz Standard Nanocrystalline 20,000 – 190,000 ~1.2 T 10kHz - 50MHz+ Compact NiZn Ferrite 100 – 1,000 ~0.3 T 30MHz - 1GHz Standard   Frequently Asked Questions   What is the difference between a common mode choke and a normal inductor? A standard inductor filters both signal and noise (differential mode). A common mode choke specifically targets noise shared across lines while leaving the actual signal untouched.   When should I use Nanocrystalline instead of Ferrite? Choose nanocrystalline cores if your design has strict space constraints or operates in high-temperature environments. They offer superior energy density compared to traditional MnZn ferrites.   Reference: https://www.amorphousoem.com/blog/common-mode-choke-inductor-design-a-strategic-guide-to-high-performance-magnetics Need a Custom EMI Solution? Selecting the right material is essential for passing CISPR 32 or Class B limit lines. Contact our engineering team today to discuss custom core specifications for your next project.

  Hot Tags : Common Mode Noise Common Mode Choke Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) MnZn Ferrite vs NiZn Ferrite Nanocrystalline instead of Ferrite Nanocrystalline cores

  Read More
• 

  Are Your EMI Filters Ready for CISPR 32 Standards?

  May 06, 2026

  Worried about EMI compliance? Discover how CISPR 32 impacts your designs and why switching to JH Amorphous Nanocrystalline cores is the ultimate key to passing Class B limits with higher efficiency and smaller footprints.   To ensure your EMI filters are ready for CISPR 32 standards, you must prioritize high-frequency impedance and thermal stability. The transition from CISPR 22 to CISPR 32 has tightened the limits for multimedia equipment, making traditional MnZn ferrite cores insufficient due to their lower permeability and saturation levels.   The most effective solution is integrating Nanocrystalline cores. These offer 10x the permeability of ferrites, allowing filters to achieve higher insertion loss in a 50% smaller volume while maintaining 99.5% efficiency.   What is CISPR 32 and Why Does It Matter? CISPR 32 is the international standard for the Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) of Multimedia Equipment (MME). It replaced the older CISPR 22 (ITE) and CISPR 13 (Audio/Video) standards to harmonize testing requirements for modern, integrated devices. For engineers, the primary challenge lies in the Class B conducted emission limits, which are particularly strict in the 150 kHz to 30 MHz range. If your EMI filter isn't optimized for these frequencies, your product simply won't hit the market.     The Bottleneck: Why Traditional Ferrites Fail CISPR 32 Tests Most engineers default to Manganese-Zinc (MnZn) ferrite cores for common mode chokes. However, as switching frequencies increase in SiC and GaN designs, ferrites encounter three major hurdles: Low Saturation (Bs): Ferrites saturate at ~0.4T, leading to catastrophic performance degradation under high current loads. Temperature Instability: Ferrite permeability drops significantly as temperatures rise toward 100°C, causing filters to fail during extended operation. Size Constraints: To meet CISPR 32 Class B, ferrite-based chokes often become too bulky for modern, compact enclosures.   The Nanocrystalline Advantage: Engineered for Compliance   At Dongguan JH Amorphous we specialize in Nanocrystalline cores that turn EMI compliance from a headache into a competitive advantage. Here is how our material outperforms traditional solutions:   1. Superior Permeability  Across Frequencies Our Nanocrystalline ribbons exhibit initial permeability ranging from 30,000 to over 150,000, whereas high-mu ferrites peak at 15,000. The Result: You get significantly higher impedance with fewer copper windings. This reduces parasitic capacitance and improves performance in the critical 10MHz+ range.   2. High Saturation Induction (1.25T) Nanocrystalline cores have a saturation induction (Bs) of 1.2T, triple that of ferrites. Design Impact: This allows the core to handle much higher DC bias currents without losing inductance, ensuring your EMI filter remains effective even at peak power loads.   3. The 50% Footprint Reduction By replacing a ferrite core with a Nanocrystalline core in high-power applications (like a 5kW inverter), engineers can reduce total filter weight by over 40% and volume by 50%.   Case Study: Passing CISPR 32 Class B in EV OBC Designs In Electric Vehicle On-Board Chargers (OBC), EMI filters must be ultra-compact. Using JH Amorphous Nanocrystalline Common Mode Cores, one client achieved: Insertion Loss: A +15dB improvement at 150kHz compared to NiZn/MnZn hybrids. Thermal Rise: Reduced by 22% due to the extremely low core losses  of our iron-based ribbons.   Checklist: Is Your Filter Ready for the Lab? Before your next EMC lab visit, ask these four critical questions: Does my choke saturate at max current? If so, you need the 1.2T headroom of Nanocrystalline. Is my impedance high enough at 150kHz? Nanocrystalline offers 10x the AL value of ferrite. Will the filter pass at 105°C? Nanocrystalline has a Curie temperature >560°C, compared to ferrite’s ~200°C. Is there enough space for cooling? Nanocrystalline’s efficiency significantly reduces heat dissipation needs.   Don't Let Magnetics Be Your Bottleneck   As power densities rise, the "old way" of using silicon steel or ferrite for EMI filters is becoming a liability. To meet CISPR 32 and stay ahead of the competition, Nanocrystalline is no longer an alternative—it is a requirement.   Ready to shrink your next design and pass EMC on the first try?   Contact Dongguan JH Amorphous today at julia@amphousoem.com to request our "Nanocrystalline vs. Ferrite" Loss Comparison Datasheet and sample kits.

  Hot Tags : EMI compliance CISPR 32 standard CISPR 32 impact EMC CISPR 32 standard Nanocrystalline cores

  Read More
• 

  Why Do Traditional Ferrite Chokes Fail in Modern High-Frequency Converters?

  Apr 24, 2026

  As power densities increase and switching frequencies rise in GaN and SiC-based converters, traditional ferrite chokes often reach their physical limits. This post explores why Nanocrystalline and Amorphous CMC solutions from Dongguan JH Amorphous are becoming the new standard for high-performance power electronics.   The Limits of Ferrite in High-Density Design While cost-effective, ferrite cores suffer from relatively low Saturation Flux Density (Bs) and poor thermal stability (below 100 degree) In modern converters, this leads to: Thermal Runaway: Ferrites lose effectiveness as temperatures rise, a critical flaw in compact power supplies Size Constraints: To achieve the necessary inductance at high currents, ferrite chokes must become prohibitively large   The Amorphous Advantage Dongguan JH Amorphous specializes in Nanocrystalline cores that offer up to 10x the permeability of ferrite   This allows engineers to: 1. Reduce Volume: Shrink the EMI filter stage by up to 50% 2. Increase Efficiency: Lower copper losses due to fewer required windings 3. Broadband Suppression: Maintain high impedance across a wider frequency spectrum, addressing both conducted and radiated emissions   Are you looking to shrink your PCB footprint without compromising on EMI suppression? Let's discuss how our nanocrystalline technology can optimize your next-gen converter.

  Hot Tags : Ferrite vs. Nanocrystalline 3 phase CMC 2 phase cmc core selection GaN and SiC-based converter Nanocrystalline and Amorphous CMC solutions

  Read More
• 

  Is Common Mode Noise Sabotaging Your Circuit Performance?

  Apr 23, 2026

    Abstract: Common Mode Chokes (CMCs) are essential passive components used to suppress high-frequency noise common to two or more data or power lines   While traditional ferrites are common, modern Amorphous and Nanocrystalline cores offer superior magnetic permeability and saturation levels, significantly enhancing EMI suppression in compact power electronic designs   The Role of a CMC in Modern Engineering In high-speed switching environments, electromagnetic interference (EMI) is an inevitable byproduct. A Common Mode Choke works by presenting high impedance to common-mode currents (noise) while allowing desired differential-mode currents (signals/power) to pass with minimal attenuation   Why Material Science Matters: Ferrite vs. Nanocrystalline For engineers in the industrial or EV sectors, the choice of core material is the difference between a passed or failed EMI test.   High Permeability: Nanocrystalline cores provide much higher impedance in a smaller footprint compared to standard ferrites   Saturation Flux Density: Amorphous materials handle higher peak currents without magnetic saturation, ensuring performance remains stable even under heavy loads   Is your current project facing stiff EMI challenges that standard off-the-shelf components can't solve? Contact our engineering team today for a free magnetic core selection consultation.  

  Hot Tags : Common Mode Chokes Ferrite vs. Nanocrystalline EMI challenge differential-mode current high impedance to common-mode currents core selection solution

  Read More
• 

  Common Mode Choke Inductor Design: A Strategic Guide to High-Performance Magnetics

  Apr 13, 2026

  In modern power electronics, a "one-size-fits-all" common mode inductor simply doesn't exist. Every project brings a unique noise profile, mechanical constraint, and thermal limit. Designing an effective component requires balancing several moving parts: winding geometry, wire gauges, and core technology. To achieve optimal EMI suppression, you have to look at the inductor not just as a part, but as a complete system.   1. Structural Integration: Vertical vs. Horizontal Mounts The physical orientation of an inductor is rarely a matter of preference; it is a strategic response to the specific geometry of your PCB and enclosure. In high-power density designs, spatial management is as critical as electrical performance. • Vertical Mounts: These are the workhorses of high-density layouts. By utilizing the Z-axis, vertical inductors minimize the "real estate" occupied on the board. This is ideal for multi-component power stages where surface area is at a premium. However, the trade-off is height. You must ensure the component doesn't interfere with the chassis or create "dead zones" in the airflow path that could lead to localized hotspots. • Horizontal Mounts: When restricted by a low-profile chassis—common in slim-line server racks or compact EV modules—horizontal mounts are essential. While they occupy a larger footprint, they keep the center of gravity low and provide better mechanical stability under high-vibration conditions. The Rule: Lock in your orientation during the initial PCB floor-planning. Beyond physical fit, the core's orientation can influence magnetic coupling with nearby sensitive traces.   2. Encapsulation Strategy: Epoxy Coating vs. Plastic Casing How the bare core is wrapped is a strategic decision between "power density" and "mechanical robustness." • Epoxy Coating (The Slim Solution): This uses a micro-thin layer of insulation, offering minimal wall thickness. In space-constrained projects, a thinner coating allows for a larger bare core within the same footprint, maximizing impedance. It’s perfect for pushing the limits of volume, though it requires careful handling during assembly to avoid stress-induced performance shifts. • Plastic Casing/Header (The Rugged Solution): For high-voltage environments or heavy industrial machinery, this "armor" is often non-negotiable. The casing provides a robust safety barrier and superior vibration resistance. While the plastic takes up more room—meaning the internal core must be slightly smaller—the gain in insulation and structural integrity is vital for safety-certified systems.   3. Impedance Optimization and Frequency Response A common mode inductor’s effectiveness is a dynamic response to your circuit's specific noise profile. The goal is to hit peak impedance exactly where your switching noise is most aggressive, typically between  and . By leveraging nanocrystalline and amorphous materials, we can redefine the impedance-to-volume ratio. These materials offer significantly higher permeability across a broader spectrum than traditional ferrites. This means you can achieve superior noise suppression in a much smaller physical package. Always prioritize the impedance curve over a simple nominal inductance rating; a precision-engineered nanocrystalline core designed for your target frequency band will always outperform a generic high-inductance part.   4. Thermal Management and Wire Gauge Selection Heat is the ultimate enemy of reliability. Selecting the right wire gauge is a trade-off between DC Resistance (DCR), current-carrying capacity, and winding limits. • Passive Reliability: Most industrial designs rely on natural convection. We select wire diameters (typically 0.8mm to 2.0mm) to ensure the component remains "thermally invisible." This ensures that even under peak load, the inductor doesn't become a heat source that triggers thermal derating in nearby semiconductors. • Engineering Rule: Never sacrifice wire gauge just to add more turns unless the magnetic benefit significantly outweighs the thermal risk. A cool-running inductor with slightly lower inductance is almost always more reliable in the field.   5. The Art of Winding Geometry Winding is where theoretical design meets physical reality. The way the copper is laid down determines the actual high-frequency behavior of the part. • Managing Parasitics: The inner diameter (ID) of the core limits how many turns you can fit in a single layer. Moving to a second layer increases parasitic capacitance, which can "choke off" high-frequency performance. Nanocrystalline cores help here—their high permeability allows you to reach target inductance with fewer turns, keeping the winding to a clean, single layer. • Advanced Patterns: Winding geometry is a powerful tuning lever. For example, specific symmetrical patterns (like our "Style 2") consistently deliver higher impedance at high-frequency peaks. For heavy-duty industrial or EV power stages, we often utilize bifilar (parallel) winding to handle high current loads while maintaining thermal and magnetic equilibrium between the coils. By integrating these five pillars—structure, encapsulation, material frequency response, thermal safety, and winding precision—you move beyond off-the-shelf limitations and build a power system that is both compliant and exceptionally reliable.

  Hot Tags : Common Mode Choke Inductor High-Performance Magnetics EMI suppression Vertical vs. Horizontal Mount Thermal Management and Wire Gauge Selection EMC Choke design

  Read More
• 

  24MW SST Design: Why Nanocrystalline Cores are the Heart of High-Frequency Power

  Mar 17, 2026

  The shift from traditional grid transformers to 24MW Solid State Transformers (SST) is driven by the need for extreme power density and efficiency. Converting 20kV to 0.8kV at a switching frequency of 30kHz requires more than just high-end semiconductors; it requires a breakthrough in magnetic material science. At JH Amorphous, we don’t just supply parts. When a client approaches us with a high-power design, our first engineering question is: "What is the topology for this component?" This allows us to tailor our nanocrystalline solutions to the specific stresses of your circuit.   The Architecture: 20kV ISOP & 30kHz DAB Scaling a system to 24MW requires a modular approach. The Input-Series Output-Parallel (ISOP) topology is used to manage the 20kV input by cascading 33 individual modules. Inside each module, the Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter operates at 30kHz. At this frequency, the magnetic core is the primary bottleneck for thermal management. This is where JH Amorphous’s material expertise becomes the critical factor in system reliability.   Why Nanocrystalline is Mandatory for 24MW SST In a 727kW module, ferrite cores often reach their saturation limits too quickly, leading to massive heat spikes. Our Nanocrystalline cores provide a superior alternative: High Saturation Flux Density (Bs：1.25T ): Our materials handle higher power in a smaller footprint, reducing the overall size of the SST. Minimal Core Loss: At 30kHz, JH Amorphous nanocrystalline ribbons exhibit significantly lower losses than traditional silicon steel or ferrite, enabling the system to exceed 98.5% efficiency. Thermal Stability: Engineered for the demanding environment of 24/7 grid operation.   Precision Control & Engineering Logic A successful SST design is a "symphony" of hardware and software. We optimize our magnetic components to support: ZVS (Zero Voltage Switching): Minimizing switching stress on SiC MOSFETs. Balanced Power Flow: Our cores are manufactured with tight tolerances to ensure consistent performance across all cascaded modules in the CHB string. Optimized Winding: We provide design consultation on Litz wire and copper foil integration to maximize the benefits of our high-permeability materials.   Powering the Future of Grid Technology At JH Amorphous, we understand that an engineer is the soul of the product. Our goal is to provide the "magnetic backbone" for your most ambitious power electronics projects. Ready to optimize your 30kHz transformer design? Contact Julia at JH Amorphous for technical datasheets and custom core benchmarking.

  Hot Tags : 20kV Grid 30kHz DAB Nanocrystalline Transformer Core 24MW SST JH Amorphous SST Design

  Read More
• 

  Case Study: How a German Heavy-Duty EV Manufacturer Tamed 800V EMI with the JHNO71.5*29.6*30.0 Core

  Jan 13, 2026

  Germany's automotive engineering sector is world-renowned for its uncompromising standards, especially in the emerging sector of 800V Heavy-Duty Electrification. Recently, a Munich-based Tier-1 supplier for electric trucks faced a critical hurdle in their 350kW Fast Charging Unit design. This case study explores how our JHNO71.5 provided the high saturation and thermal resilience needed to handle extreme currents where standard Ferrite failed. The Challenge: "The 800V Heat Trap" The German engineering team was developing a high-power DC/DC converter for an electric semi-truck. The shift from 400V to an 800V architecture meant faster charging, but it also brought severe EMI challenges and massive heat generation. Saturation at Peak Load: The charging currents exceeded 400A. Traditional ferrite cores saturated instantly, losing inductance and allowing EMI noise to breach VDE standards. Limited Cooling: The busbar layout was tight. The core needed to handle high DC bias without requiring an active cooling loop directly on the choke. Vibration & Stress: Unlike passenger cars, heavy-duty trucks generate significant vibration. The magnetic core needed superior mechanical protection. They needed a "Heavyweight" magnetic solution—robust, large, and thermally stable. The Solution: The Heavy-Duty JHNO71.5*29.6*30 We introduced the 30, a high-performance Iron-based Nanocrystalline core specifically dimensioned for high-power units. Why this specific core solved the problem: Massive Effective Area (Ae) for High Power:With an Outer Diameter (OD) of 71.5mm and a Height of 30mm, this core offers a significantly larger magnetic cross-section than standard 55mm cores. This prevents saturation even under the massive current spikes typical of heavy-duty charging cycles. High Bs (1.25T) vs. Ferrite:While Ferrite saturates at ~0.4T, our Nanocrystalline material maintains linearity up to 1.25 Tesla. This allowed the German team to reduce the physical size of the filter by 50% compared to a ferrite stack, fitting perfectly into the IP67 aluminum housing. Broadband Attenuation (10kHz - 30MHz):The core provided exceptional insertion loss across the critical frequency spectrum, ensuring the 800V system passed the stringent CISPR 25 Class 5 and commercial vehicle EMC standards (ISO 7637). Thermal Endurance:Operating in a gearbox-adjacent environment, the core's stability from -40°C to +140°C (Curie temp 570°C) ensured zero performance degradation during long-haul climbs in summer heat. Robust "German-Grade" Packaging To meet the vibration requirements of the truck industry, the JHNO71.5*29.6*30.0 is encapsulated in a reinforced PBT (UL94-V0) Case. This square-profile casing protects the nanocrystalline ribbon from mechanical shock and mounting pressure, ensuring the permeability remains constant over the vehicle's 15-year lifecycle. The Outcome: Production Ready By integrating the JHNO71.5*29.6*30.0, the client achieved: 30% Volume Reduction in the EMC filter stage. Full Compliance with 800V EMC regulations without additional shielding. Thermal Safety: The core runs cooler due to lower hysteresis losses compared to alternative metal powder cores. ConclusionIn the era of 800V heavy-duty EVs, "standard" magnetic components are no longer enough. The 30 Nanocrystalline Core offers the brute strength (High Bs) and precision (High Permeability) required by German engineering standards. For more details, check: https://www.amorphousoem.com/product/jhno71529630-nanocrystalline-common-mode-choke-core-for-ev-power-units

  Hot Tags : High Power Nanocrystalline Core High Saturation Flux Density Core (1.25T) High Current EMI Filter Core Heavy-Duty EV Charger Core Iron-Based Nanocrystalline Tape Wound Core Thermal Stable Toroidal Core (-40°C to 140°C)

  Read More
• 

  Case Study: How an Italian EV Charger Manufacturer Solved Thermal & EMI Challenges with Our 54mm Nanocrystalline Core

  Jan 11, 2026

  In the competitive landscape of European automotive electronics, thermal management and EMI compliance are the twin hurdles every engineer must clear. Recently, a prominent Tier-1 manufacturer of On-Board Chargers (OBC) based in Turin, Italy, approached us with a critical design bottleneck. This case study details how switching from Ferrite to our Iron-based Nanocrystalline Core (54.0x 50.5 x 18.0 mm) helped them downsize their 22kW charging module while surviving extreme engine compartment temperatures. The Challenge: Saturation at High Temperatures The Italian engineering team was designing a high-density DC/DC converter stage for a new electric hypercar. They faced two specific problems using traditional Mn-Zn Ferrite cores: Thermal Derating: At the target operating temperature of 120°C, the Ferrite cores were losing significant permeability, leading to EMI filter failure. Size Constraints: To prevent magnetic saturation under high current spikes, they had to stack multiple ferrite cores, which violated the strict height restriction of the OBC housing. They needed a solution that offered high saturation flux density (Bs) and stable inductance in a compact footprint. The Solution: High Bs Nanocrystalline Technology After reviewing their magnetic circuit requirements, we proposed our Nanocrystalline Toroidal Core (Model: 54.0）. Here is why this specific core was the perfect fit for their application: 1.25T Saturation Flux Density (Bs): Unlike Ferrite (Bs ~0.4T), our iron-based nanocrystalline material handles three times the flux density. This allowed the Italian team to replace two stacked ferrite cores with a single Nanocrystalline unit, reducing weight and volume immediately. Extreme Thermal Stability: With a Curie Temperature of 570°C and a crystallization temperature of 510°C, the core’s magnetic properties remain virtually unchanged from -40°C to +140°C. Superior Inductance per Turn: The core delivers an AL value of ≥ 100.0 µH (at 1kHz, 0.3V). This high impedance allowed the engineers to achieve the required Common Mode attenuation with fewer wire turns, further reducing copper loss (I²R). Robust Packaging for Automotive Standards Reliability is non-negotiable in the EU market. The Italian client was particularly impressed with the encapsulation. The core is housed in a Square-Top Seam Black PBT Case (Polybutylene Terephthalate). Material: UL94-V0 rated PBT. Temperature Rating: Certified for continuous operation up to 140°C. Mechanical Protection: The rigid case protects the delicate nanocrystalline ribbons from winding stress, ensuring the mechanical pressure does not degrade the magnetic permeability (magnetostriction effect). The Result: Successful EMC Certification By integrating the 54.0mm Nanocrystalline core, the client successfully: Reduced Component Height: Met the 20mm clearance requirement (Core height is 18.0mm). Passed CISPR 25 Class 5: The high permeability at 10kHz–150kHz solved their low-frequency noise issues. Enhanced Durability: The effective cross-sectional area (Ae = 168.48 mm²) provided robust performance without saturation during load dump transients. ConclusionFor power electronics engineers struggling with space constraints and high-temperature environments, traditional materials often fall short. As proven by our Italian partners, switching to High-Bs Nanocrystalline cores is not just an upgrade—it is a necessity for next-gen EV power electronics. Looking for high-performance magnetic cores? Check our full datasheet for the 54.0mm series or contact our engineering team for custom samples. For more details, check: https://www.amorphousoem.com/product/jhno-nanocrystalline-common-mode-choke-core-for-ev-power-units

  Hot Tags : Nanocrystalline Common Mode Choke Core High Bs Nanocrystalline Core 1.25T High Temperature Stable Magnetic Core (140°C) Compact EMI Core for High Current Broadband Noise Suppression Nanocrystalline PBT Encapsulated Toroidal Core

  Read More
• 

  Amorphous vs. Nanocrystalline Cores: The Critical Selection for EVs and PV Inverters

  Dec 11, 2025

    The relentless push toward electrification—from high-performance Electric Vehicle (EV) power control units to grid-optimizing Photovoltaic (PV) inverters—is uniformly demanding components that can handle higher switching frequencies, increased power densities, and extreme efficiency. When system frequencies push past conventional limits, traditional ferrite materials often become the bottleneck, introducing significant losses. For R&D engineers, selecting the right soft magnetic material is not just a component swap; it's a critical decision that dictates the product's performance, size, and ultimate cost. Amorphous and Nanocrystalline materials are the key contenders in this high-stakes selection battle.   1. The Deep Dive: How Material Structure Defines High-Frequency Performance Both Amorphous and Nanocrystalline cores achieve their characteristic exceptionally high permeability  and ultra-low core loss  due to their unique microstructures:   Amorphous Cores: The atoms are in a disordered, non-crystalline state, which eliminates grain boundaries and effectively minimizes eddy current losses. Typically iron-based, amorphous materials boast a high Saturation Magnetic Flux Density (Bs) (up to 1.6T), making them highly suitable for high-current, high-power applications where minimizing volume is paramount.   Nanocrystalline Cores: These are created by subjecting amorphous alloys to a precisely controlled annealing process, resulting in ultra-fine grains (only 10 nanometers in size). This structure nearly eliminates effective magnetic anisotropy, leading to the lowest loss and highest permeability among soft magnetic materials, especially across the mid-to-high frequency spectrum.   Here is a quick reference table comparing key parameters for engineers:   Performance Parameter Traditional Ferrite Amorphous Core (Fe-based) Nanocrystalline Core (Fe-based) Design Significance Saturation Flux Density (Bs)  0.4-0.5T  1.5-1.6T 1.2-1.3T Determines transformer/inductor volume (Higher Bs allows smaller size). Operating Frequency Range Mid-to-High Freq. (>100kHz） Mid-to-Low Freq. (<50 kHz) Wideband (10 kHz to 10 MHz) Defines system efficiency and switching capability. Permeability （ui） approx 1000~5000 approx 10000~50000 Up to 190000 Critical for common mode choke effectiveness and turn count. Core Loss (Pv) High (at high frequencies) Low Extremely Low Directly impacts heat generation and system reliability.   2. Key Applications: Efficiency Breakthroughs in Automotive and Solar EV Power Control: The Key to Cooling and Filtering As On-Board Chargers (OBCs) and DC-DC converters push past 100kHz, the ultra-low loss of nanocrystalline materials makes them the preferred choice for main transformers and resonant inductors, significantly reducing thermal dissipation and boosting efficiency.   For Electromagnetic Compatibility EMC, EV control units generate substantial high-frequency noise. Nanocrystalline cores, with their exceptionally high permeability, are the ideal material for manufacturing high-performance Common Mode Chokes (CMCs), effectively suppressing noise across the 10 kHz to 10 MHz range.     PV Inverters: Balancing Power and Efficiency Amorphous alloys are frequently used in large-current filter inductors within high-power PV systems. Their high Bs and excellent low-frequency loss characteristics allow them to handle large current swings in a smaller form factor. In modular inverters targeting higher power density, Nanocrystalline is adopted in high-frequency transformers and CMCs to maximize conversion efficiency and overall system compactness.     3.  Grasping Future Design Trends   While Amorphous cores remain vital in large-power filtering and lower-frequency applications due to their high saturation flux density and cost advantages, Nanocrystalline cores are rapidly becoming the default solution for high-frequency power electronics driven by SiC/GaN platforms. This shift is driven by their ultra-low loss and superior permeability across a wide bandwidth. Engineers must precisely balance operating frequency, thermal limits, and power density targets when finalizing their material selection.   The future will demand even higher system frequencies, placing greater pressure on soft magnetic materials. Continuous optimization of nanocrystalline core performance will be central to ensuring the long-term reliability of high-performance power electronics systems.   Is your next high-frequency, high-power project bottlenecked by magnetic core selection?   As a specialized manufacturer of high-performance Amorphous and Nanocrystalline soft magnetic materials, Dongguan JH Amorphous controls the core technology from ribbon to precise thermal processing. We provide customized core solutions tailored specifically to your OBC, DC-DC, or PV inverter design needs, guaranteeing efficiency improvements and size optimization.   We invite you to visit our website  today or send your detailed design specifications to our engineering team. Let our professional soft magnetics experts provide you with the selection advice and sample support you need to unlock the next level of performance for your product!

  Hot Tags : how to Balance Power and Efficiency in PV inverter Amorphous vs. Nanocrystalline How Material Structure Defines High-Frequency Performance high-performance Common Mode Chokes is nanocrystalline core worthy on EV The Key to Cooling and Filtering in EV Power Control

  Read More
• 

  How Magnetic Materials Shape the Future of Liquid-Cooled 8.5 kW Server Power Supplies

  Dec 09, 2025

  Engineering Insights into EMI Filters, PFC Chokes, and the Role of 1K107B Nanocrystalline vs. 1K101 Amorphous Cores As power supplies for data centers and AI servers enter the 8.5 kW to 12 kW range, engineers face a significant architectural shift. Liquid cooling is becoming mainstream, switching frequencies are rising, and power density is pushing beyond 100 W/in³. These trends have brought a new bottleneck to the front of PSU design: Magnetic materials — especially those used in EMI filters and PFC chokes — increasingly determine the feasibility of next-generation liquid-cooled power architectures. A commonly referenced teardown image of an 8.5 kW server PSU illustrates this point clearly: EMI Filter positioned at the thermal entrance PFC Choke (TTPFC) running at high frequency Bulk Capacitors in the center LLC stage and main transformer toward the cold plate regions Compact mechanical layout optimized for liquid cooling This configuration highlights a fundamental truth: when switching frequency increases and heat-spreading paths become constrained, magnetic core loss becomes the dominant thermal source in these front-end components.   1. Why Liquid Cooling Makes Magnetic Materials More Critical Liquid cooling greatly improves heat extraction from power semiconductors (GaN, MOSFETs, SR devices). However, many magnetics — especially EMI filters and PFC inductors — are not mounted directly on cold plates. In an 8.5 kW PSU: The cold plate is reserved for semiconductors and key transformers EMI and PFC inductors sit in restricted airflow zones Their thermal paths are poorly coupled to the liquid cooling loop This leads to an important engineering observation: Magnetic components now rely far more on intrinsic core loss performance, rather than on mechanical cooling solutions. As a result, differences between materials such as 1K107B nanocrystalline and 1K101 amorphous become significantly amplified.   2. The Rise of High-Frequency PFC: A Stress Test for Magnetic Materials Typical PFC switching frequencies have increased from: 20–30 kHz → 40–70 kHz → approaching 100 kHz in TTPFC designs. This shift improves power density but also raises: AC flux density Switching ripple High-frequency harmonics Core temperature Because of this, the high-frequency loss curve becomes the dominant factor in magnetic selection.   Key Findings: 1K107B Nanocrystalline Core Lower high-frequency core loss More stable permeability Better temperature behavior Enables smaller inductors Reduces hotspot temperature by 10–20°C in many PSU designs   1K101 Amorphous Core Core loss increases steeply above 20–40 kHz Larger physical size required Higher hotspot temperatures Less suitable for compact, liquid-cooled PSUs In practice, many 6–8 kW PSU designs using 1K101 encounter either:✔ Excessive temperature rise✔ Oversized inductorsBoth of which limit system scalability.   3. Material Selection for EMI Filters in Liquid-Cooled PSUs EMI filters are especially sensitive to high-frequency noise and temperature constraints. They require: High permeability Low HF loss Surge robustness Stable inductance under thermal stress Nanocrystalline material (1K107B) offers advantages in: Broadband EMI suppression Maintaining inductance at elevated temperatures Reducing size for compact front-end layouts Lower incremental loss across switching harmonics Therefore: In modern 8.5 kW PSU designs, EMI filters increasingly favor 1K107B over 1K101.   4. Where Amorphous Material Still Excels Despite the advantages of nanocrystalline cores in high-frequency stages, 1K101 amorphous remains the preferred material for: Current transformers (CTs) Low-frequency PFC input inductors Large magnetic flux swing operations HVDC filtering stages High saturation flux requirements This means: The shift is not about replacing amorphous materials,but about using each material where it performs best.   5. Industry Trends: Migration Toward High-Frequency-Optimized Materials Across major server OEMs and hyperscale power suppliers, engineering teams are converging on a clear material strategy for liquid-cooled PSUs: ✔ EMI Filter → 1K107B Nanocrystalline ✔ PFC Choke (TTPFC) → 1K107B Nanocrystalline ✔ Current Transformers → 1K101 Amorphous ✔ Input Inductors → Mixed (depending on ripple and frequency) A shared viewpoint is emerging: As PSU power density surpasses 100 W/in³,magnetic material selection becomes just as critical as topology selection.   🗣️ Discussion: What Will Be the Next Bottleneck? As server PSUs evolve from 8.5 kW → 10 kW → 12 kW, liquid cooling and GaN technologies will continue to push the boundaries of power density. But magnetics remain key thermal contributors — especially in front-end EMI and PFC stages. A question for engineers designing next-generation AI server PSUs: Which magnetic component do you expect to become the next limiting factor in ultra-dense liquid-cooled designs? EMI choke? TTPFC inductor? LLC transformer? Or the magnetic materials themselves?   Your insights and field experiences are welcome.

  Hot Tags : nanocrystalline core for high-frequency PFC choke design nanocrystalline vs amorphous comparison for TTPFC inductors 1K107B Nanocrystalline Cores 1K101 Amorphous Cores Magnetic materials for EMI filters and PFC chokes Nanocrystalline material (1K107B)

  Read More
• 

  Why Magnetic Core Material Plays a Crucial Role in Inductor Performance: A Deep Dive

  Nov 20, 2025

  Now fast-paced world of electronics, engineers are constantly faced with the challenge of optimizing circuit performance while maintaining compactness and energy efficiency. One crucial, yet often overlooked, component in these designs is the magnetic core used in inductors. The material of the magnetic core can dramatically influence the inductor’s performance, particularly in high-frequency applications. This blog will explore how different magnetic core materials impact inductor performance, why choosing the right material is critical, and how these materials affect the efficiency and longevity of your electronic devices.   The Importance of Magnetic Core Material Magnetic cores play a vital role in the function of inductors. They influence inductance, energy storage, efficiency, and power losses. The performance of an inductor is highly dependent on the magnetic material it’s made from, and the right choice of material can make a significant difference in how well the device operates across different frequencies and power levels. There are several materials commonly used for magnetic cores in inductors, such as ferrite, silicon steel, and nanocrystalline alloys. Each material comes with its own set of advantages and limitations, making it essential for engineers to understand the material properties in order to make the right choice for a given application.   How Different Magnetic Core Materials Affect Performance Mn-Zn Ferrite CoresFerrite cores are made from iron oxide combined with other metals, and they are widely used in high-frequency applications like switch-mode power supplies and transformers. They offer relatively low eddy current losses at high frequencies, making them suitable for circuits operating in the kilohertz (kHz) to megahertz (MHz) range. Additionally, ferrite cores have high magnetic permeability, which means they can store more magnetic energy with relatively low losses, improving circuit efficiency. However, Mn-Zn ferrite cores have limitations at very high frequencies, where losses can increase due to core material saturation. Ferrite cores are also less efficient at very low frequencies, which makes them less suitable for power transformers or circuits that require low-frequency performance.   Nanocrystalline CoresNanocrystalline cores, a newer material in magnetic technology, offer exceptional performance in high-frequency applications. These cores are made from iron and other elements arranged in a nanocrystalline structure, which allows them to exhibit significantly higher magnetic permeability compared to ferrite cores. Nanocrystalline cores provide lower losses and higher efficiency in high-frequency circuits, such as power inductors in high-frequency switching power supplies. Their higher saturation flux density makes them particularly useful for high-power applications, where maintaining performance at higher current levels is essential. The main advantage of nanocrystalline cores over ferrite is their ability to operate with up to 30% lower high-frequency losses. They also maintain low hysteresis losses even at very high frequencies (several hundred kHz), making them ideal for applications in the 5G telecommunications, electric vehicles (EVs), and data centers.   Silicon Steel CoresSilicon steel is another material that has been used for decades in power transformers and other low-frequency applications. Its relatively low magnetic losses make it suitable for power transformers operating at 50-60Hz in traditional power grids. However, silicon steel’s performance at higher frequencies is limited due to significant eddy current losses. This makes it less suitable for high-frequency applications, such as modern power electronics or devices that operate in the kHz-MHz range.   The Mechanism Behind Magnetic Core Performance The performance of magnetic cores in inductors is largely determined by the following factors: Magnetic Permeability: The ability of a material to support the formation of a magnetic field. Higher permeability means better energy storage capacity and lower losses. Hysteresis Losses: The energy lost when the magnetic material is magnetized and demagnetized. Materials with lower hysteresis losses are more efficient. Eddy Current Losses: Induced currents within the core material that cause heat loss. High-frequency applications require materials that minimize these losses. Saturation Flux Density: The maximum magnetic field strength the material can handle before its magnetic properties break down. A higher saturation flux density means the material can handle higher currents without losing performance.   Quantifying the Performance Gains Nanocrystalline materials reduce high-frequency losses by up to 30% compared to Mn-zn ferrite cores. They also provide 2-3 times higher permeability, which means more efficient energy storage and enhanced inductor performance in high-power, high-frequency applications. These materials are particularly useful in systems requiring low hysteresis loss and high-frequency operation (several hundred kHz), which are essential in modern electronics like switch-mode power supplies, 5G networks, and electric vehicles (EVs).   Choosing the Right Core Material for Different Applications When selecting a magnetic core for an inductor, engineers must consider the specific requirements of the application: Switch-Mode Power Supplies (SMPS): Ferrite and nanocrystalline cores are ideal for high-frequency operation and minimizing losses. Electric Vehicles (EV): Nanocrystalline cores, with their high saturation flux density and low losses, are essential for handling large currents in high-power applications. 5G Networks: High-performance cores, such as nanocrystalline, offer superior efficiency for handling high-frequency signals while minimizing power loss. Data Centers: For high-speed communication and efficient power conversion, nanocrystalline cores are increasingly being used to improve system efficiency.    The Critical Role of Magnetic Core Material in Inductor Design Magnetic core material plays a critical role in the performance of inductors and the overall efficiency of electronic circuits. By selecting the appropriate core material—whether it’s ferrite, nanocrystalline, or silicon steel—engineers can ensure that inductors function efficiently across different frequencies and power levels. Understanding the benefits and limitations of each material is essential for optimizing circuit designs in today’s high-performance, energy-efficient electronic systems. As technologies like 5G, electric vehicles, and AI data centers continue to evolve, the importance of choosing the right magnetic core material will only grow.   What’s Your Biggest Challenge in High-Frequency Inductor Design? In the fast-evolving world of electronics, engineers are continuously tasked with pushing the limits of technology. Whether you’re designing power supplies, communication systems, or next-gen EVs, understanding the relationship between magnetic core material and inductor performance is key to achieving optimal results.   Let us know your thoughts, DM us. 

  Hot Tags : magnetic core nanocrystalline cores over ferrite nanocrystalline core VS Mn-zn ferrite core nanocrystalline common mode choke high saturation nanocrystalline core

  Read More